As the curtains closed on the 22nd Conference of the Parties (COP22) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Marrakech in November 2016 we can soon analyse how much media attention it raised. Before the summit, there was a hope that the unprecedented speed of ratification of the Paris Agreement leading to its entry into force on 4 November would turn media’s eyes towards Marrakech to scrutinise how governments are starting to turn words in a treaty into action. While we do not have data on media coverage of COP22 – it is likely to be significantly lower than for COP21 when the worlds’ eyes were on Paris.
One reason for this is surely that the Marrakesh summit overlapped with the presidential election in the US. Other reasons, however, are likely more systemic to the way media works and this has important implications for the role it can play in ensuring governments keep the promises they made in Paris.
In a recently published study, we looked at the role media can play in public accountability in global climate governance. Accountability in general terms involves a social relationship between someone who should be answerable for his/her actions (accountee) towards someone else (accountholder). Public accountability involves the ability of citizens to hold at least their own (and possibly other) governments to account for their (lack of) actions. In our case we were interested in the role of media in enabling public accountability of the goals on climate change that states develop together with other states. Strong public accountability could strengthen both the democratic legitimacy of global climate governance and keep the pressure on governments to implement their commitments. This is important as governments are not very keen to hold each other to account for implementation – also not in the Paris Agreement.
The starting point for our study was that an active media coverage of and media commentary on key meetings in global climate governance is one indicator of media’s role in holding governments to account for the promises they make in these meetings – most lately through adopting the Paris Agreement. We analysed coverage in leading newspapers in seven countries (Finland, India, Laos, Norway, South Africa, UK and USA) of key meetings in global climate governance including, COP meetings, in the period 2004-2009. We counted both the total number of articles written about the meetings and how many of those articles were commentaries in the form of editorials, opinion pieces and the like. Our interest in commentaries is due to their association with a part of the public sphere that still allows space for longer evaluation of arguments and evidence.
The study shows that newspaper coverage was limited or absent for meetings that were not:
- attended by Heads of State;
- the launch of a new process or;
- linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The pattern of coverage differs significantly amongst individual newspapers, with no clear distinction between developed and developing country papers. Among the UNFCCC meetings the COPs most covered were those where major negotiation mandates or new agreements were expected. Unsurprisingly media engages more easily with events that can be sold as ‘new’ in some respect compared to either the negotiation meetings preparing for them or subsequent meetings that may scrutinise follow-up. For example, COP15 in Copenhagen in 2009 had very high coverage – in contrast to COP14 in Poznan the preceeding year – where there was still time to provide significant input.
The very low coverage by traditional media of the more ‘boring’ meetings prior to or after e.g. the launching of a new negotiation mandate or a new agreement poses a significant obstacle to public accountability on if and how governments will meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement.
Social media plays a much bigger role compared to the role it played in our study period. However, the traditional news media has in parallel moved online and its articles are spread through Twitter and other social media platforms, merging the two mediums.
The five year contribution cycles are a key building block of the Paris Agreement. But if they are to become virtuous cycles – leading to mutual encouragement amongst countries to do more – the public need to follow the issues and support increased ambition. This should happen through both traditional and social media. Society would therefore serve the Paris Agreement well if it keeps journalists and editors on their toes and makes it clear there is an audience for well-informed critical analysis of how well governments keep their promises.
Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Assistant professor, Public Administration and Policy, Wageningen University and member of Climate Strategies
 The methodology and results can be found in Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., et al. (2016). “Read all about it!? Public accountability, fragmented global climate governance and the media.” Climate Policy. DOI
 Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. and H. Van Asselt (2015). Strengthening Accountability under the 2015 Climate Change Agreement. Policy Brief no 2, Climate Strategies, London. Available at
 Another route is the activities of (trans)national non-governmental organizations who follow these processes and scrutinise the actions of governments within and outside them, see Steffek, J. (2010). “Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance.” Ethics & International Affairs 24(1): 45-68.
 The methodology and results can be found in Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., et al. (2016). “Read all about it!? Public accountability, fragmented global climate governance and the media.” Climate Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1213695